If you cannot defend a study ethically, you should not and will not be allowed to conduct it. When you are planning a research project, ethics must always be considered. Stem Cell pros and cons had to be valued carefully, for a number of reasons. The previously heated debate seems to have lead to new solutions which makes both sides happier. Even though many issues regarding the ethics of stem cell research have now been solved, it serves as a valuable example of ethical cost-benefit analysis. The stem cell-research is an example of the, sometimes difficult, cost-benefit analysis in ethics which scientists need to do. we do not know for sure that we can use stem cells to clone transplantable organs. The scientific value has been overstated or has flaws.We should wait until those methods are available. We should (and will) develop more ethical methods (such as using adult stem cells) which will enable us to research ethically.Destroying human life in the hopes of saving human life is not ethical." A fertilized egg should be valued as a human life even if it is in its very first weeks. "A life is a life and that should never be compromised.Critics against stem cell research argued that the ethical issues of scientific work on aborted fetuses did not justify the possible benefits.The research would give great insights about the basics of the body.Adult stem cells would not be that interesting because they do not have the same properties as stem cells from a fetus."If someone is going to have an abortion, isn’t it better that we use it for something useful?"."The benefits of stem cell research have such a great outcome that they outweigh the ethical issues." (Cost-benefit-analysis).This section serves as an illustration of the difficult evaluations researchers may have to analyze. Since then, scientists have moved on to use more ethical methods for stem cell research, such as iPS. These points are based on the old debate about the methods of stem cells research, from before 2007. The controversy regarding the method involved was much tenser when researchers used Embryonic Stem Cells as their main method for stem cell research. It is hard to say whether this is true, but we have seen devastating consequences of other research-programs, even with good intentions, such as nuclear research.Ģ) Stem Cell Research - Pros and Cons About the Methods Involved Some argue that stem cell research in the far future can lead to knowledge on how to clone humans."Humans should not be trying to play God".Stem cells may play a major role in cancerīetter treatment of these diseases could also give significant social benefits for individuals and economic gains for society Cons.Reduced Risk of Transplantation (You could possibly get a copy of your own heart in a heart-transplantation in the future.Heart Diseases, Stroke and Diabetes (Type 1). It could lead humanity closer to better treatment and possibly cure a number of diseases: Stem cell research can potentially help treat a range of medical problems. 1) Stem Cell Research - Arguments Regarding the Usage of the KnowledgeĪs you will most probably notice, the following arguments are not exclusively in use when talking about stem cell research. Since 2007, the second point, concerns about the methods involved, has been less debated, because of scientific developments such as iPS. The first issue is really not just about stem cell research, as it may be applied to most research about human health. There were two main issues concerning stem cell research with both pros and cons: This is probably an important advancement in stem cell research, since it allows researchers to obtain pluripotent stem cells, which are important in research, without the controversial use of embryos. iPS are artificially derived from a non-pluripotent cell, such as adult somatic cells. Since then, researchers have moved on to more ethical study methods, such as Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPS). This is typically done just days after conception or between the 5th and 9th week. Up until the recent years, the research method mainly focused on Embryonic Stem Cells, which involves taking tissue from an aborted embryo to get proper material to study. The controversy surrounding stem cell research led to an intense debate about ethics. These are fertilized human eggs that were not implanted into a woman. Also the primary source of stem cells is from blastocysts. There are stem cells in the both placenta and blood contained in the placenta. Aborted fetuses are not the only source of stem cells
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |